Tony’s BBQ Ordered to Relocate as Belcan Bridge Project Moves Forward

Tony’s BBQ has taken to social media to rally public support after being ordered to leave its current location near the Belcan Bridge, but the Ministry of Infrastructure Development and Housing says the structure is occupying space required for the safe and efficient replacement of the bridge.  The owners, Manuel Perdomo and Sarah Beck, were given 30 days to remove the barbecue stand from the public road reserve, with the deadline set for August 15. They subsequently filed a formal grievance asking the Ministry to reconsider the relocation. In a response dated July 21, MIDH maintained that the stand must be removed because the area is needed to provide unobstructed pedestrian access to the temporary crossing, maintain emergency and evacuation routes, and allow contractors, heavy equipment and machinery to operate safely. The Ministry also says the space may be required as construction arrangements change during the project.  According to MIDH, Tony’s BBQ has no lease, permit, concession or other legal authorization to occupy the road reserve. The Ministry also raised concerns about customers parking on the sidewalk and heated grilling equipment being operated within an area intended for pedestrians.  While the business owners are now appealing for public support, MIDH says the relocation is necessary to prevent the stand from obstructing the infrastructural workspace required to advance the Belcan Bridge Replacement Project.  The Ministry acknowledged that earlier statements may have suggested the business would not need to relocate. It explained, however, that construction plans can change as engineering designs, site investigations and safety assessments progress, and that any informal assurance cannot override the Public Roads Act.  The relocation will be permanent, meaning Tony’s BBQ will not be allowed to return to the road reserve once the bridge project is completed.  The Belize City Council has reportedly identified an alternative location nearby and has indicated that it is willing to help facilitate the move. MIDH, however, says it has no legal obligation to provide compensation or relocation assistance because the existing structure is unauthorized.  The Ministry has also declined the owners’ request for another meeting, saying their concerns have already been reviewed. It is encouraging the business to work with the City Council on arrangements for the alternative site.  If the structure remains after August 15, MIDH says it may pursue enforcement action to remove it and recover the associated costs.